To piggy back off this topic, we are currently in a campaign and have been tracking what percentage of our campaign dollars are coming from bequest expectancies as a contribution type. This is to monitor and ensure we don't have too much of our campaign relying on revocable pledges. My question is what to do once the bequest is realized. In our system, it is still considered "bequest expectancy" dollars but should we be updating this breakdown so it's clear how many dollars are truly unrealized, revocable pledges vs. the revocable pledges that have been fulfilled and no longer have the same risk factor? For instance, should we move these dollars out of the bequest expectancy bucket to our commitment/pledge bucket?
To get back to the original question, we create the shell of a designation record with all the attributes we know of the fund (as John indicated) so that when the purpose has been declared, it reflects correctly in our reporting. Once the bequest is realized, we'll work to have the fund created with our finance partners and update the designation record with the appropriate fund number.
Leah
------------------------------
Leah Richards
Director of Advancement Services
St. John Fisher University
lrichards@sjfc.edu------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 02-13-2023 03:02 PM
From: Thomas Chaves
Subject: Campaign Reporting Restrictions on Unrealized Bequest Endowments
We create the endowment at the expectancy level so advancement reporting is accurate. The tie to the general ledger is not as important since they don't count on the books testamentary commitments.
When the eventual gift/cash comes in we would look to make the appropriate ties to the GL.
Thanks
Tom
--
Thomas Chaves Associate VP for Advancement Operations Office of Advancement Saint Joseph's University 5600 City Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19131 O: 610-660-1255 | M: 610-316-6541 | tchaves@sju.edu SJU.edu |