FundSvcs Community

 View Only
  • 1.  Counting Planned Gifts Outside of Campaign

    Posted 08-30-2023 04:48 PM

    Hi all, 

    We are trying to figure out the recommendations for counting planned gifts outside of a campaign. Within our campaign, we have been using the guideline of "if the donor will be 65 years old by the end of our campaign" we count that planned gift towards our campaign and in our total commitments for that year. After this campaign ends, we are wondering what the guideline is for counting planned gifts in our yearly totals outside of the campaign. Would it just be if the donor is 65 within the next year? Would love to hear your thoughts on this!



    ------------------------------
    Katie Bokenkamp
    Willamette University
    kbokenkamp@willamette.edu
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Counting Planned Gifts Outside of Campaign

    Posted 08-30-2023 04:58 PM
    CASE has the same 65-year-old guideline for reporting in the VSE. They must turn 65 during that fiscal year (or earlier) to be reported in the VSE.

    John

    John H. Taylor
    Principal
    John H. Taylor Consulting, LLC
    2604 Sevier St.
    Durham, NC   27705
    919.816.5903 (cell/text)

    Serving the Advancement Community Since 1987






  • 3.  RE: Counting Planned Gifts Outside of Campaign

    Posted 08-31-2023 01:26 PM
    Katie, you can only reports 65+ gifts to the VSE, but I recommend counting planned gifts differently for recognition and stewardship purposes. 

    Recognition and stewardship counts are intended to incentivize behaviors among gift officers and donors. If you count planned gifts for crediting your gift officers, you'll get more planned gifts, and generally, a more holistic conversation about total philanthropy and alignment with a donor's overall philanthropic goals. If you recognize donors for certain types of gifts, donors will be more interested in giving in those ways. The research shows pretty consistently that bequest intentions are not capstone gifts, they're opening gifts, and that substantially younger donors are quite open to making these commitments. The results of counting at younger ages are broadly positive and substantial.

    In practice, the younger you count, the longer the timeline will be before gifts mature. If you shift to a policy of counting from 55 or 45, you're going to see bigger numbers up-front, but the percentage of the value of your portfolio of bequest that matures into realized estate distributions will be small. You'll get lots of new gifts, but the number of realized gifts won't change much at first, and the percentage will therefore look small. It's important to prepare leaders for that change, and to realize it may take 10+ years for your reporting numbers to mature, and for those metrics to reach a new equilibrium.

    Unfortunately, maintaining multiple counting regimes can be difficult and confusing, so defaulting to 65+ is likely your best option if there is not an accompanying strategic conversation about bequests.

    Thank you,
    Isaac Shalev
    Data Strategy Expert
    Sage70, Inc.
    (917) 859-0151
    isaac@sage70.com

    Schedule a 30-minute consultation now: