I don't know if I agree with that sentiment. I also think it's probably not a great metric, but it's a start. I also think there's context needed. This metric shows where work is needed to try to obtain better email addresses. Click-through rates are more a measure of content and engagement, which may not be what the OP is looking for.
I'm not at a higher-ed organization currently, so I don't have a comparable suggestion. Universities have traditionally struggled with this, as most alumni don't engage after matriculation. I would think this does show that more work does need to be done to get more active email addresses.
------------------------------
Dariel Dixon
Chautauqua Institution
ddixon@chq.org------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 08-19-2025 10:47 AM
From: Erin Osenbaugh
Subject: Acceptable Email Deliverability Rates
Percentage delivered is an interesting metric to choose - it's missing the "so what" factor. Deliverability just means it arrived it an inbox. So what? Measuring percentage delivered means you're just sending emails to send emails. It also means 40 percent of your emails are bad, which is not great.
Organizations used to track open rate, but now that most providers auto-open emails in a preview pane it's no longer useful. The number you should be tracking is click rate or click-to-open rate (COTR). That shows your message prompted an action, that the recipient engaged with it. For my peers that number is between 5 and 10 percent.
------------------------------
Erin Osenbaugh
The Dallas Foundation
eosenbaugh@dallasfoundation.org
------------------------------