Yes, in that case I'm in full agreement with you.
Thank you,
Isaac Shalev
CRM Expert
Sage70, Inc.
(917) 859-0151
isaac@sage70.com
Schedule a *30-minute consultation *now:
https://calendly.com/sage70/30min
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 5:03 PM John Taylor <
johntaylorconsulting@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Issac, the response pertained to cumulative payments - not anticipated or
> future payments.
>
> You are correct in that providing benefits without cash-in-hand is
> problematic. Although many organizations will still provide whatever items
> based only on a pledge. That's their financial decision. But as long as
> the annual receipt reflecting the sum of all payments also reflects the
> value of those benefits as a reduction in the gift, then all is well.
>
> Of course, some organizations "beat" the QPQ issue entirely by clearly
> stating that "no gift is necessary" and provide the benefit based on a
> pledge only and without regard to any payment. But, again, that is their
> financial decision.
>
> John
>
>
> John H. Taylor
> Principal, John H. Taylor Consulting
> 2604 Sevier St.
> Durham, NC 27705
>
johntaylorconsulting@gmail.com
> 919.816.5903 (cell/text)
>
> Serving the Advancement Community Since 1987
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:07 PM Isaac Shalev <
isaac@sage70.com> wrote:
>
>> That one feels a bit wiggly because the future recurrences are not
>> irrevocable. You're giving something in response to a gift of some dollar
>> amount, and an unsubstantiated promise of some other dollar amount. If the
>> recurring gift had no cancellation, it's a pledge, but if you can cancel
>> freely, it's a gift intention at best.
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Isaac Shalev
>> CRM Expert
>> Sage70, Inc.
>> (917) 859-0151
>>
isaac@sage70.com
>>
>> Schedule a *30-minute consultation *now:
>>
https://calendly.com/sage70/30min
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM John Taylor <
>>
johntaylorconsulting@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am not seeing where it says you can sum all the payments. This
>>> reference mentions only "when the payment is at least $55.50." It does not
>>> say "the sum of all payments." Nonetheless, I agree with you! I just have
>>> not seen this clearly stated by the IRS (and this is not an IRS website
>>> although it does give you a link to the IRS).
>>>
>>> John H. Taylor
>>> Principal, John H. Taylor Consulting
>>> 2604 Sevier St.
>>> Durham, NC 27705
>>>
johntaylorconsulting@gmail.com
>>> 919.816.5903 (cell/text)
>>>
>>> Serving the Advancement Community Since 1987
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:06 PM Kerry Kavalo <
KKavalo@orsymphony.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I believe it is the total for all items. This website lays it out
>>>> nicely with more links for reference:
>>>>
http://www.njnonprofits.org/giftsubs.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Advancement Services Discussion List [mailto:
>>>>
FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Liz Arizpe
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 07, 2019 10:42 AM
>>>> *To:*
FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG
>>>> *Subject:* [FUNDSVCS] 2019 IRS Benefits limits - Question
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good Morning,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For the low cost article limit of $11.10 does this refer only to one
>>>> item or could it be multiple items that their combined value is under the
>>>> $11.10?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Liz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Liz Arizpe
>>>>
>>>> Director of Advancement Services
>>>>
>>>> Valparaiso University
>>>>
>>>> Advancement
>>>>
>>>> 1100 Campus Drive South
>>>>
>>>> Valparaiso, IN 46383
>>>>
>>>> (Phone) 219-464-5610
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *The information contained in this communication is confidential and is
>>>> intended only for use by the addressee(s). Unauthorized review, use,
>>>> disclosure or copying of this communication, or any part thereof, is
>>>> strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
>>>> please notify us immediately by return email and destroy this communication
>>>> and all copies thereof, including all attachments.*
>>>>
>>>