FundSvcs Community

 View Only
  • 1.  Question about language in letter that accompanied a gift

    Posted 01-08-2019 04:21 PM
    I have junk that would depend on how you use your unrestricted fund. But if for purposes they specify their gift cannot be used then yes - you would need to put the gift in a program or maybe facilities fund. Of course when in doubt, I would contact the donor and explain your plans for use of their gift and get their okay. John John Taylor 919.816.5903 johntaylorconsulting@gmail.com Big ideas; small keyboard > On Jan 8, 2019, at 5:14 PM, Carper Stephanie <stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com> wrote: > > We recently received a gift from a family foundation. The gift was accompanied by a note that included the following statement: > > “We would like for this contribution to be used exclusively for your organization’s main purpose, and not for miscellaneous mailings, fund raising etc.” > > Would you take this language to mean that we cannot put the gift into an unrestricted fund? > > Thank you, > > Stephanie > > Stephanie Carper | Development Manager, Major and Planned Gifts > > Ronald McDonald House Charities, Inc. > 110 N. Carpenter St, Chicago, IL 60607-2101 > Cell: 312.520.8370 > stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com | www.rmhc.org > > <image003.jpg> >


  • 2.  Question about language in letter that accompanied a gift

    Posted 01-08-2019 09:14 PM
    We recently received a gift from a family foundation. The gift was accompanied by a note that included the following statement: "We would like for this contribution to be used exclusively for your organization's main purpose, and not for miscellaneous mailings, fund raising etc." Would you take this language to mean that we cannot put the gift into an unrestricted fund? Thank you, Stephanie Stephanie Carper | Development Manager, Major and Planned Gifts Ronald McDonald House Charities, Inc. 110 N. Carpenter St, Chicago, IL 60607-2101 Cell: 312.520.8370 stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com<mailto:stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com> | www.rmhc.org<http://www.rmhc.org> [cid:image001.jpg@01D24A50.04D56A20]


  • 3.  Re: Question about language in letter that accompanied a gift

    Posted 01-08-2019 09:18 PM
    Do you have gift overhead? Perhaps code as exempt. Aaron Aaron Forrest CPA Senior Director Gift and Donor Services University of Rochester Office of Advancement Larry and Cindy Bloch Alumni and Advancement Center 300 East River Road Rochester NY 14627 Office 585.275.2799 / Fax 585-273-4558 Email aaron.forrest@rochester.edu [Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.gif@01C92E92.3629C5E0] <http://www.rochester.edu/> P Please consider the environment before printing this email. Confidentiality Notice: This message, including attachments may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. From: Advancement Services Discussion List <FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG> On Behalf Of Carper Stephanie Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 5:14 PM To: FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG Subject: [FUNDSVCS] Question about language in letter that accompanied a gift We recently received a gift from a family foundation. The gift was accompanied by a note that included the following statement: "We would like for this contribution to be used exclusively for your organization's main purpose, and not for miscellaneous mailings, fund raising etc." Would you take this language to mean that we cannot put the gift into an unrestricted fund? Thank you, Stephanie Stephanie Carper | Development Manager, Major and Planned Gifts Ronald McDonald House Charities, Inc. 110 N. Carpenter St, Chicago, IL 60607-2101 Cell: 312.520.8370 stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com<mailto:stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com> | www.rmhc.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.rmhc.org&d=DwMFAg&c=kbmfwr1Yojg42sGEpaQh5ofMHBeTl9EI2eaqQZhHbOU&r=MraOYpMOnCsIdm9axhPA4iXJhhPExcCA4gBqoRhHvTU&m=ZdF0rwekw3Yf_u2B3VkPqS_IpLv8uwOEZr2B5RaE8qs&s=_KVRKHnRMMhwLqf3kS4F_XPxk9DtgQ9xwzBBgwGOu0A&e=> [cid:image001.jpg@01D24A50.04D56A20]


  • 4.  Re: Question about language in letter that accompanied a gift

    Posted 01-08-2019 09:25 PM
    I would: they restricted the gift to programs. Marianne Sent from my iPhone On Jan 8, 2019, at 5:14 PM, Carper Stephanie <stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com<mailto:stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com>> wrote: We recently received a gift from a family foundation. The gift was accompanied by a note that included the following statement: “We would like for this contribution to be used exclusively for your organization’s main purpose, and not for miscellaneous mailings, fund raising etc.” Would you take this language to mean that we cannot put the gift into an unrestricted fund? Thank you, Stephanie Stephanie Carper | Development Manager, Major and Planned Gifts Ronald McDonald House Charities, Inc. 110 N. Carpenter St, Chicago, IL 60607-2101 Cell: 312.520.8370 stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com<mailto:stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com> | www.rmhc.org<http://www.rmhc.org> <image003.jpg>


  • 5.  Re: Question about language in letter that accompanied a gift

    Posted 01-08-2019 09:39 PM
    We treat gifts with the slightest of restrictions as restricted and put them in a fund on their own or in a fund with similar restrictions, if any. This one will be placed in its own fund or in an existing fund that may fit its restrictions. I doubt we have any existing fund for this type of restriction. In reality and for spending purposes, this gift is highly flexible and borderline unrestricted. Whoever uses the fund, i.e., the president, VP etc... will have a lot of flexibility within the limitations. But for the purpose of audit, fundraising and other reports, it will be classified restricted. Semere. Semere-Ab S. Abiyo, CPA, CGA, CPA (US) Director, Alumni and Donor Services Division of University Advancement, University of Toronto J. Robert S. Prichard Alumni House 21 King’s College Circle Toronto, Ontario M5S 3J3 E-mail: semere.abiyo@utoronto.ca<mailto:semere.abiyo@utoronto.ca> Tel: +1 416 978-4886 Fax:+1 416 978-1066 ________________________________ From: Advancement Services Discussion List <FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG> on behalf of Marianne Pelletier <marianne@STAUPELL.COM> Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 5:25 PM To: FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG Subject: Re: [FUNDSVCS] Question about language in letter that accompanied a gift I would: they restricted the gift to programs. Marianne Sent from my iPhone On Jan 8, 2019, at 5:14 PM, Carper Stephanie <stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com<mailto:stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com>> wrote: We recently received a gift from a family foundation. The gift was accompanied by a note that included the following statement: “We would like for this contribution to be used exclusively for your organization’s main purpose, and not for miscellaneous mailings, fund raising etc.” Would you take this language to mean that we cannot put the gift into an unrestricted fund? Thank you, Stephanie Stephanie Carper | Development Manager, Major and Planned Gifts Ronald McDonald House Charities, Inc. 110 N. Carpenter St, Chicago, IL 60607-2101 Cell: 312.520.8370 stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com<mailto:stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com> | www.rmhc.org<http://www.rmhc.org> <image003.jpg>


  • 6.  Re: Question about language in letter that accompanied a gift

    Posted 01-09-2019 07:47 PM
    One other factor to keep in mind is that "restricted" tends to mean something slightly different under accounting standards than under CASE standards. Under CASE standards (for reporting on the VSE, etc.), it generally just means that the donor specified the use of the funds. In accounting there is the concept that gifts with "restrictions of a general nature" can be considered unrestricted. "Restricted" under those standards means that there is some substantive limitation on the spending of the funds that comes from outside the nonprofit institution, and the overhead to assure that those constraints are met is somewhat involved (creating a restricted fund, putting the money into the restricted fund, verifying that funds meeting the restriction have been expended, releasing the restriction, moving the funds to the unrestricted asset class, etc.). That's an unreasonable amount of work for a relatively modest gift to be used for a purpose that you're going to spend that amount of money and more on regardless. While you could go through the whole process, the analysis is essentially that it wouldn't have a material effect on the financial position of the organization, so the funds can be considered to be without donor restriction. So it seems to me that, at least on the accounting side, those funds could well be considered unrestricted. My US$0.02 worth; the usual disclaimers apply. Good luck! Alan Alan S. Hejnal Data Quality Manager Smithsonian Institution - Office of Advancement 600 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 600E P.O. Box 37012, MRC 527 Washington, DC 20013-7012 *: 202-633-8754 | *: HejnalA@si.edu<mailto:HejnalA@si.edu> [SNAGHTML5cbfa34]<https://www.si.edu/> [AASP_FundSvcs_LOGO-01(040pct)(mark)] From: Advancement Services Discussion List <FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG> On Behalf Of Semere-Ab Abiyo Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 5:39 PM To: FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG Subject: Re: [FUNDSVCS] Question about language in letter that accompanied a gift We treat gifts with the slightest of restrictions as restricted and put them in a fund on their own or in a fund with similar restrictions, if any. This one will be placed in its own fund or in an existing fund that may fit its restrictions. I doubt we have any existing fund for this type of restriction. In reality and for spending purposes, this gift is highly flexible and borderline unrestricted. Whoever uses the fund, i.e., the president, VP etc... will have a lot of flexibility within the limitations. But for the purpose of audit, fundraising and other reports, it will be classified restricted. Semere. Semere-Ab S. Abiyo, CPA, CGA, CPA (US) Director, Alumni and Donor Services Division of University Advancement, University of Toronto J. Robert S. Prichard Alumni House 21 King's College Circle Toronto, Ontario M5S 3J3 E-mail: semere.abiyo@utoronto.ca<mailto:semere.abiyo@utoronto.ca> Tel: +1 416 978-4886 Fax:+1 416 978-1066 ________________________________ From: Advancement Services Discussion List <FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG<mailto:FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG>> on behalf of Marianne Pelletier <marianne@STAUPELL.COM<mailto:marianne@STAUPELL.COM>> Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 5:25 PM To: FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG<mailto:FUNDSVCS@LISTSERV.FUNDSVCS.ORG> Subject: Re: [FUNDSVCS] Question about language in letter that accompanied a gift I would: they restricted the gift to programs. Marianne Sent from my iPhone On Jan 8, 2019, at 5:14 PM, Carper Stephanie <stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com<mailto:stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com>> wrote: We recently received a gift from a family foundation. The gift was accompanied by a note that included the following statement: "We would like for this contribution to be used exclusively for your organization's main purpose, and not for miscellaneous mailings, fund raising etc." Would you take this language to mean that we cannot put the gift into an unrestricted fund? Thank you, Stephanie Stephanie Carper | Development Manager, Major and Planned Gifts Ronald McDonald House Charities, Inc. 110 N. Carpenter St, Chicago, IL 60607-2101 Cell: 312.520.8370 stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com<mailto:stephanie.carper@us.mcd.com> | www.rmhc.org<http://www.rmhc.org> <image003.jpg>