Hi everyone. I've been thinking about endowed fund stewardship lately, and I think I'm experiencing some cognitive dissonance. I've been in this profession a long time, beginning in donor stewardship. I've always taken our commitment to fulfilling donor intent very seriously.
Maybe a little too seriously?
I know that a gift involves the donor relinquishing control (IRS Pub 526). Donors can't maintain control, yet we demonstrate our compliance with their intentions all the time. Donors ask us how we spent their funds. Auditors ask us to demonstrate that we have allocated according to donor intent. When we can't do that, our endowment payouts accumulate, so there is a real cost to not being able to honor donor intent. Indeed, our endowments are so binding, we can only change some of them in probate court.
So, if the donor relinquished control, how free are we really?
Are there certain "intentions" that we ought not honor, even if we wanted to? (eg gender, religion, family descent)
Thanks,
Susan
------------------------------
Susan Quinn
Lenoir-Rhyne University
emmersonquinn@gmail.com------------------------------